top of page

Feeling, Detachment, and Awakening

  • Writer: NEERAJ SUTHAR
    NEERAJ SUTHAR
  • Jan 2
  • 5 min read

Why Knowing the Truth Doesn’t Cancel Being Human

There comes a point in life when spiritual knowledge stops feeling comforting and starts feeling confrontational.

You know the ideas.You’ve heard them.You may even believe them.

And yet—you still feel pain.You still feel love.You still feel fear.

This is where the real questions begin.

If death is unavoidable, why are we born?If we are not the body, why does the body react with fear?If attachment causes suffering, why does love still feel meaningful?And if realization is real, why does grief still show up?

Most people rush to answers.Very few sit with tension.

This article is about that tension.



The Fundamental Misunderstanding About Detachment

Detachment is often taught as emotional withdrawal.

It is not.

The Bhagavad Gita never asks a human to stop feeling. It asks something far more difficult:

Feel fully, without losing clarity.

Detachment (vairāgya) does not mean indifference.It means non-ownership.

You still feel pain when hurt.You still feel fear when threatened.You still feel love when connected.

But you no longer build your identity on these states.

That distinction changes everything.


Why Fear Persists Even After “Knowing”

One of the most uncomfortable realizations is this:

Awareness does not cancel biology.

You can know:

  • that you are not the body

  • that death is inevitable

  • that consciousness may continue beyond form

And still:

  • flinch at pain

  • feel fear near death

  • protect the body instinctively

This is not spiritual failure.This is a proper incarnation.

Fear is not ignorance.It is a survival mechanism.

The mistake is not feeling fear.The mistake is mistaking fear for truth.



Arjuna, Abhimanyu, and the Myth of Emotional Enlightenment

There is a story often misunderstood.

When Abhimanyu dies in the Mahabharata, Arjuna grieves.And Krishna is said to weep—not for the death itself, but for Arjuna’s pain.

At first glance, this looks contradictory.

Did Krishna not teach Arjuna the Gita?Did Arjuna not understand that the soul is eternal?

So why grief?

Because the Gita was never about emotional suppression.

Arjuna’s duty was not:

  • to stop loving his son

  • to bypass grief with philosophy

His duty was:

  • to grieve without abandoning dharma

  • to feel without collapsing into despair

  • to love without becoming blind

And he did exactly that.

If Arjuna had not felt pain, that would have been a failure of humanity—not a success of spirituality. This pain is what makes us human - a biological being.



Detachment Is Not About Avoiding Pain

It’s About Avoiding Distortion

Pain is unavoidable.Distortion is optional.

Distortion is when:

  • grief becomes identity

  • loss becomes meaninglessness

  • love becomes dependency

  • fear becomes paralysis

The Gita teaches clarity inside emotion, not escape from emotion.

This is why mature spirituality feels grounded, not dramatic.



“Aham Brahmāsmi” — Awakening or Ego?

The statement Aham Brahmāsmi (“I am Brahman”) is among the most misused ideas in spiritual discourse.

Taken from the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, it does not mean:

  • “This personality is divine”

  • “I am superior”

  • “Nothing affects me”

It points to something far subtler:

The awareness through which ‘I’ is known is not separate from ultimate reality.

The danger lies in who says it.

When the doer says “I am Brahman,”ego inflates.

When the observer recognizes it,ego dissolves.

A simple test applies:

  • If the thought makes you feel bigger, it’s ego

  • If it makes you feel quieter, it’s insight

True awakening does not expand identity.It de-centers it.



Why “Neti Neti” Is Safer Than Affirmations

The Upanishadic method Neti Neti (“not this, not this”) is powerful precisely because it does not add anything.

It subtracts.

  • Not the body

  • Not thoughts

  • Not emotions

  • Not roles

  • Not even the idea “I am aware”

Ego survives by accumulation.It dies by subtraction.

Affirmations often strengthen identity.Negation weakens it.

This is why Neti Neti quietly moves one into the observer perspective without creating a new spiritual self.



Why the Awakened Sound Unimpressive

One of the clearest signs of maturity is this:

The need to sound awakened disappears.

Language requires separation:

  • speaker and listener

  • teacher and student

Awareness collapses those distinctions internally.

So answers become:

  • simple

  • minimal

  • sometimes unsatisfying

This is why genuinely realized individuals often sound ordinary, while performative spirituality sounds absolute and confident.

Certainty is comforting.Clarity is quieter.



If Death Is Certain, Why Are We Born at All?

This is the question most philosophies circle around but rarely answer honestly.

If everything ends—if bodies decay, relationships dissolve, identities disappear—Then what exactly is the point?

The Bhagavad Gita does something radical here.It does not provide a final metaphysical reason for birth.

Instead, it shifts the frame.

Life is not born to reach a destination.Life arises to be experienced.

Meaning is not assigned upfront.It emerges through participation.

A song does not exist because it will last forever.It exists because it can be heard now.

Impermanence does not cancel meaning.It defines it.



The Doer, the Observer, and the Order That Matters

A critical mistake in modern spirituality is reversing the order.

People try to become observers before learning detachment.That never works.

The correct sequence is:

  1. Detachment (Vairāgya) – cleaning perception

  2. Doer (Kartā) – acting responsibly without ownership

  3. Observer (Sākṣī) – witnessing without dissociation

Without detachment:

  • the doer becomes ego

  • the observer becomes numbness

Detachment does not stop action.It removes psychological clinging to outcomes.

Only then can one act fully and observe clearly.



“God Wasted 10 Years of My Life” vs “I Got a Restart”

This tension is not philosophical—it’s deeply personal.

There are two ways to look at lost years.

Lens 1: Loss (Emotionally True)

Some experiences are age-locked.Some doors do not reopen.

You cannot redo:

  • school innocence

  • college romance

  • early versions of yourself

Acknowledging this is not negativity.It is grief, and grief deserves respect.

Lens 2: Restart (Existentially True)

A restart does not mean:

  • same timeline

  • same innocence

It means:

  • higher awareness

  • fewer illusions

  • more agency

You don’t replay Version 1.You author Version 2 with eyes open.

These lenses are not enemies.

One answers what was lost.The other answers what now.

Maturity is holding both without collapsing into either.




Love, Missed Opportunities, and the Myth of “Too Late”

When you get into a relationship, early love feels intense because it is unconscious.Later love feels meaningful because it is chosen.

They are not substitutes.They are different experiences.

Missing one does not invalidate the other.

What hurts is not the absence of love—it is the absence of that particular version of it.

That loss is real.

But love itself is not exhausted by time.Only certain forms are.



Why Most Spiritual Quotes Fall Apart Under Scrutiny

Quotes like:

“Everything happens for a reason”

often fail because they try to justify pain instead of helping people live with it.

A more honest framing is:

Not everything was necessary.Not everything was wasted.Some things simply happened.And now you respond.

This removes:

  • divine micromanagement

  • victim-blaming spirituality

  • forced gratitude

And restores:

  • authorship

  • responsibility

  • dignity





Awakening Is Not an Achievement

It’s a Reduction

Awakening does not give:

  • certainty

  • cosmic explanations

  • moral superiority

It gives:

  • fewer false positions

  • less internal noise

  • more tolerance for not-knowing

That’s why awakened people often sound unimpressive.

There is nothing to sell.Nothing to defend.Nothing to prove.



The Quiet, Livable Conclusion

You are allowed to:

  • know that everything ends

  • feel pain when it does

  • love without guarantees

  • act without ultimate certainty

Spirituality does not ask you to escape being human.

It asks you to inhabit it without distortion.



One Line Worth Keeping

I don’t need to justify my past to respect my future.

No denial.No romanticizing suffering.No false certainty.

Just clarity—and the courage to live anyway.



Final Note

If this article resonates, it’s not because it offers answers. It’s because it refuses to lie.

And sometimes, that’s the most peace an honest mind can ask for.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page